• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:39:52 +0100
• In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0508181110460.5394@m...>
• Thread-index: AcWkCBw3umvZS6gKQg+9BMaq1cQY3AAApoXg

> 
>There are more failures from the self-constituted groups of amateur 
>standards writers than there are successes.  You are going to quote back 
>to me the few notable successes from the amateurs but they are fewer 
>than their counterparts.  Don't confuse myth for math.

How does a standards writer acquire professional standing, please?

And can you give an example of a group that is not self-constituted?

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

• References:
  • RE: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
    • From: Vladimir Gapeyev <vgapeyev@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Next by Date: Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Previous by thread: RE: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Next by thread: RE: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread