Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote: > There are more failures from the self-constituted groups of amateur > standards writers than there are successes. You are going to quote back > to me the few notable successes from the amateurs but they are fewer > than their counterparts. Don't confuse myth for math. I presume hard numbers are what tells apart myth from math. Are there any numbers to back up this claim? (That's a question out of genuine -- even though amateur -- interest, really!) Vladimir
|
