• To: "'Rich Salz'" <rsalz@d...>,"'Robin Berjon'" <robin.berjon@e...>
• Subject: RE: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 09:33:26 +0100
• Cc: "'XML Developers List'" <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <43064AAE.4060307@d...>
• Thread-index: AcWlAnwS0OFL0FkVQfSbRVbnfZvVbAAX0asA

> Perhaps W3C should formalize an "interim public review" 
> phase, which is 
> a WD that is explicitly put out for review

It's called a Public Working Draft - there are lots of them.

Michael Kay

• References:
  • Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: IsWeb 2.0 the new XML?
• Next by Date: RE:Namespaces are flawed
• Previous by thread: Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Next by thread: Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: IsWeb 2.0 the new XML?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread