• To: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Subject: Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 17:10:06 -0400
• Cc: 'XML Developers List' <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <430647A3.30304@e...>
• References: <20050818233419.DD71FD6EFD@m...> <430647A3.30304@e...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040421

> IMHO a large part of the problem here is that there are too few checks 
> during the Working Draft phase, which puts an enormous strain on Last 
> Call, resulting over time in the practice now increasingly common of 
> having multiple LCs, or of going to CR then back to LC, or giving up and 
> making a Note out of it, etc.

I agree.

Perhaps W3C should formalize an "interim public review" phase, which is 
a WD that is explicitly put out for review, and goes through many of the 
things that happen at LC -- notifying the reps, a blurb on the status 
pages, etc.  Just don't require the WG to make an official response to 
every issue.

	/r$

-- 
Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology                           http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway   http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>

• References:
  • Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Next by Date: Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: IsWeb 2.0 the new XML?
• Previous by thread: Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Next by thread: RE: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread