• To: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>
• Subject: Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>
• Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 23:01:02 +0200
• Cc: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <e3a5cb2c050816112910fc62c0@m...>
• References: <4301E192.40005@e...> <4301e5f3.387f4e70.7f22.ffffb133SMTPIN_ADDED@m...> <e3a5cb2c050816112910fc62c0@m...>

* Michael Champion wrote:
>That seems like a useful question to ask, especially since W3C seems
>to be trying hard to learn from what XSD and some WGs did wrong.

Interesting. And I already wondered whether there might be some kind
of Obfuscated Recommendation Contest going on to find the editors for
the XML Schema 2.0 specifications. Perhaps they don't mean to produce
XML Schema-style unreadable gibberish after all.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@h... · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 

• References:
  • Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
  • Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
    • From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Next by Date: Best XML Database with best GUI
• Previous by thread: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Next by thread: Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread