• To: Liam Quin <liam@w...>
• Subject: Re: Why XML for Messaging?
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 15:26:54 -0400
• Cc: Ken North <kennorth@s...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <20050601184012.GB1518@w...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE07206FA3@h...> <429DEA93.7010502@d...> <001201c566d0$72aae400$1601a8c0@DURANTE> <20050601184012.GB1518@w...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040421

> A story I sometimes tell...
> 
> Suppose you work at a large bank, and are tasked with implementing
>...
> around each field, and they smile happily and say "six weeks". :-)

And right-justified without extra spaces!  Cool...

-- 
Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology                           http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway   http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html

• References:
  • Why XML for Messaging?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
  • Re: Why XML for Messaging?
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
  • Re: Why XML for Messaging?
    • From: "Ken North" <kennorth@s...>
  • Re: Why XML for Messaging?
    • From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Why XML for Messaging?
• Next by Date: Ignorable Whitespace in Fragments
• Previous by thread: Re: Why XML for Messaging?
• Next by thread: Re: Why XML for Messaging?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread