• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Why XML for Messaging?
• From: "Ken North" <kennorth@s...>
• Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 10:36:26 -0700
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE07206FA3@h...> <429DEA93.7010502@d...>

Rich Salz wrote:
> appreciated if you've lived through other bridges:
> com/corba

That's the first answer that comes to mind.

The COM versus CORBA debates produced a desire for a platform-neutral solution,
and we'd already seen the demonstrated interoperability of TCP/IP and HTTP.



======== Ken North ===========
www.WebServicesSummit.com
www.SQLSummit.com
www.GridSummit.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Why XML for Messaging?
    • From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>

• References:
  • Why XML for Messaging?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
  • Re: Why XML for Messaging?
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Why XML for Messaging?
• Next by Date: Re: Why XML for Messaging?
• Previous by thread: Re: Why XML for Messaging?
• Next by thread: Re: Why XML for Messaging?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread