• To: "David Lyon" <david.lyon@c...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Why XML for Messaging?
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 16:02:08 -0700
• Thread-index: AcVm+pqPp09nXU0rTXCDO0Jog2TFmwAAwtpg
• Thread-topic: Why XML for Messaging?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Lyon [mailto:david.lyon@c...] 
> Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 5:26 AM
> To: xml-dev@l...
> Subject: Re:  Why XML for Messaging?
> 
> On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 5:51 pm, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> > I'm not sure where the idea that this is technology 
> exclusive to Sun 
> > and not Microsoft comes from. Can you clarify?
> 
> Don't take it so personally Dare. You make it sound like you 
> guys are wannabees..

Actually I was wondering if Len got this from some marketing literature
or an article. Creating an XML API that can be layered on top of a
binary format is as old as XML parsing APIs so I'd be surprised to see
if someone was touting this as a competitive advantage 

--
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
A bird in the hand is safer than one overhead.   

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.  

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Why XML for Messaging?
    • From: David Lyon <david.lyon@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Why XML for Messaging?
• Next by Date: [ANN] YesLogic Prince 5.0 beta 1
• Previous by thread: Re: Why XML for Messaging?
• Next by thread: Re: Why XML for Messaging?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread