• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Why XML for Messaging?
• From: David Lyon <david.lyon@c...>
• Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 08:30:43 -0400
• Cc: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>
• In-reply-to: <f1d84be8a790699e88467c94a82ac360@a...>
• References: <f1d84be8a790699e88467c94a82ac360@a...>
• User-agent: KMail/1.7.1

On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 3:53 pm, Amelia A Lewis wrote:
> On 2005-06-01 15:21:36 -0400 "Bullard, Claude L (Len)"
>
> <len.bullard@i...> wrote:
> >> There are better tools for handling XML, both at API level and
> >> at user/data level?
> >
> > No.  There are better syntaxes than XML for messaging.
>
> Are there?
>
> What are they?

He's just pulling your leg...

Don't let him [expletive deleted] you in.....

-- 
Computergrid : The ones with the most connections win.

• References:
  • RE: Why XML for Messaging?
    • From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Why XML for Messaging?
• Next by Date: RE: Why XML for Messaging?
• Previous by thread: RE: Why XML for Messaging?
• Next by thread: Re: Why XML for Messaging?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread