• To: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
• Subject: Re: XML "Smells"?
• From: Bob Foster <bob@o...>
• Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 14:52:26 -0700
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <200505291719.j4THJVK08935@f...>
• References: <42999B6E.30397.402042CE@localhost> <200505291719.j4THJVK08935@f...>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)

Joe English wrote:
 > Andrzej Jan Taramina wrote:
 >
 >>In reading about Code Smells ( http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?CodeSmell ), I was
 >>curious if anyone had isolated/recorded/categorized any "XML Smells"?
 >
 > Number one has got to be QNames-in-content.

Really? I thought it would be treating namespace identifiers as URLs.

Bob Foster

 >
 > The data you get back from freshmeat.net's "Project Record
 > in XML" links smells really bad to me too, though I haven't
 > got a name for any of the things that are wrong with it.
 >
 >
 > --Joe English
 >
 >   jenglish@f...

• References:
  • XML "Smells"?
    • From: "Andrzej Jan Taramina" <andrzej@c...>
  • Re: XML "Smells"?
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>

• Prev by Date: Russian doll schemas stink? (was: Re: XML "Smells"?)
• Next by Date: Re: XML "Smells"?
• Previous by thread: Re: XML "Smells"?
• Next by thread: Re: XML "Smells"?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread