• To: Christian Nentwich <christian@s...>
• Subject: Russian doll schemas stink? (was: Re: XML "Smells"?)
• From: Jeff Rafter <lists@j...>
• Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 13:20:31 -0700
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <1109406593.20050529182954@s...>
• References: <1117376448.27904.ezmlm@l...> <42999B6E.30397.402042CE@localhost> <1109406593.20050529182954@s...>
• Reply-to: lists@j...
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)

 > Russian doll schemas...
> A veritable dung heap. I am overpowered already :-)

Hang on a second... what about Russian doll schemas makes them an 
xml-smell? I mean, I can understand situations where openness and shared 
structure are goldmines for interoperability, but I can just as quickly 
think of 10-20 reasons why you would want to localize definitions.

Thanks,
Jeff Rafter

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Russian doll schemas stink? (was: Re: XML "Smells"?)
    • From: Christian Nentwich <christian@s...>

• References:
  • XML "Smells"?
    • From: "Andrzej Jan Taramina" <andrzej@c...>
  • Re: XML "Smells"?
    • From: Christian Nentwich <christian@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML "Smells"?
• Next by Date: Re: XML "Smells"?
• Previous by thread: Re: XML "Smells"?
• Next by thread: Re: Russian doll schemas stink? (was: Re: XML "Smells"?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread