• To: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>
• Subject: Re: Re: Non-infoset
• From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>
• Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:50:20 +1000
• Cc: Richard Tobin <richard@i...>, XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <425AE296.6010408@m...>
• Organization: Zenucom Pty Ltd
• References: <20050411203504.3488328BDD9@m...> <425AE296.6010408@m...>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (X11/20040502)

Elliotte Harold wrote:

> Richard Tobin wrote:
>
>> The infoset is a property of the document.  If a processor doesn't
>> read the DTD, then it can only produce an approximation to the true
>> infoset, but the document still has an infoset, and that infoset has
>> the entities expanded.
>
>
> By that reasoning, no true infosets have any unexpanded entity 
> reference information items.
>
> It seems that a document can have multiple infosets depending on how 
> one processes it (with or without entity expansion).
>
>
or indeed if the dtd changes over time, so might the infoset.......

if len can introduce quantum physics to the discussion, maybe i can 
introduce relativity ;)

rick

begin:vcard
fn:Rick  Marshall
n:Marshall;Rick 
email;internet:rjm@z...
tel;cell:+61 411 287 530
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard

• References:
  • Re: Re: Non-infoset
    • From: richard@i... (Richard Tobin)
  • Re: Re: Non-infoset
    • From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Schema for unordered elements
• Next by Date: Re: Are URIs Resources? (WAS RE: Re: Non-infoset)
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Non-infoset
• Next by thread: Re: Non-infoset
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread