• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: Non-infoset
• From: richard@i... (Richard Tobin)
• Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 21:35:04 +0100 (BST)
• Cc:
• In-reply-to: <425AAF82.3080408@m...>
• Organization: HCRC, University of Edinburgh

In article <425AAF82.3080408@m...> you write:
>I found another exception. If the DTD is not read, and an attribute 
>value contains an unrecognized entity reference, then the document does 
>not have an infoset.

The infoset is a property of the document.  If a processor doesn't
read the DTD, then it can only produce an approximation to the true
infoset, but the document still has an infoset, and that infoset has
the entities expanded.

-- Richard

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: Non-infoset
    • From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>

• References:
  • Re: Re: Non-infoset
    • From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Are URIs Resources? (WAS RE: Re: Non-infoset)
• Next by Date: Re: Are URIs Resources? (WAS RE: Re: Non-infoset)
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Non-infoset
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Non-infoset
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread