• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: incompatible uses of XML Schema
• From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 20:06:09 +1000
• In-reply-to: <200504210909.j3L99BkL005213@m...>
• References: <200504210909.j3L99BkL005213@m...>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (X11/20040502)

Michael Kay wrote:

>>Perhaps vendors should be encouraged more to clearly state the limits
>>to the conformance of their main products pages:
>>   We don't support wildcards.
>>   We don't support xsi':type
>>   We don't support elements-in-elements
>>   We don't enforce unambiguity
>>etc.     
>>
>>    
>>
>
>Or perhaps some independent party could put this information together in one
>place so that the rest of us can compare the products side-by-side.
>
>Michael Kay
>http://www.saxonica.com/
>
>  
>
I would be happy to collate a website for this (or is this better as 
part of Ron's database)?
Please email to XML-DEV with phrase "Schema Compatability" in the subject.

Cheers
Rick

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: incompatible uses of XML Schema
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
  • Re: incompatible uses of XML Schema
    • From: ht@i... (Henry S. Thompson)
  • Schema Compatability - was Re: incompatible uses of XML Schema
    • From: "M. David Peterson" <m.david.x2x2x@g...>

• Prev by Date: RE: incompatible uses of XML Schema
• Next by Date: Re: incompatible uses of XML Schema
• Previous by thread: RE: A Stakeholder's Response: XQuery APIs for Middle Tier and Clients
• Next by thread: Schema Compatability - was Re: incompatible uses of XML Schema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread