• To: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• Subject: Re: incompatible uses of XML Schema
• From: ht@i... (Henry S. Thompson)
• Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 12:15:57 +0100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <42677B11.1030803@a...> (Rick Jelliffe's message of"Thu, 21 Apr 2005 20:06:09 +1000")
• References: <200504210909.j3L99BkL005213@m...><42677B11.1030803@a...>
• User-agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Security ThroughObscurity, linux)

Please also come to the W3C Workshop on XML Schema 1.0 User
Experiences [1], one of whose goals is to compare notes on
interoperability problems and, we hope, increase pressure on vendors
to fix the big ones.

I have to say I'm amazed that their are commercial products out there
which claim to support W3C XML Schema but not wildcards -- that's not
one that has ever surfaced before in messages to this list or
xmlschema-dev.

ht

[1] http://www.w3.org/2005/03/xml-schema-user-cfp.html
-- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@i...
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: incompatible uses of XML Schema
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>

• References:
  • Re: incompatible uses of XML Schema
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Schema Compatability - was Re: incompatible uses of XML Schema
• Next by Date: Re: Schema Compatability - was Re: incompatible uses of XML Schema
• Previous by thread: Re: Schema Compatability - was Re: incompatible uses of XML Schema
• Next by thread: RE: incompatible uses of XML Schema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread