• To: Gregor <iamgregor@g...>
• Subject: Re: incompatible uses of XML Schema
• From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
• Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 10:35:17 -0700
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <642f07b605042621447636c89a@m...>
• References: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D104A34B11@R...> <426E70C5.3000807@a...> <642f07b605042621447636c89a@m...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)

Gregor wrote:
>>People *are* confused by schema-using applications (other than validators)
> 
> 
> I would like to say something about the usage of XML Schema/validators
> nonetheless:
> 
> I am currently facing the a problem with XML processors that are
> evaluated for their XML Schema validation capabilities in Industry
> Standards (CIDX, PIDX, RosettaNet for a start).
> 
> The limitations of one of the processors are huge (no id-constraints,
> no wildcards, no mixed-attribute) so I have resorted to classifying
> the features of XML Schema and then applying the classification to the
> Industry Standard vocabularies.
> 
> Since, for example, no industry standard is using wildcards all test
> cases that test for wildcards need not be run on the processors for
> the output is irrelevant in the scenario at hand.

I assume you mean none of the industry standards you are using uses 
wildcards. Other industry standards do use wildcards. For example, HL7 
makes liberal use of the xsd:any element.

-- Ron

• References:
  • RE: incompatible uses of XML Schema
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
  • Re: incompatible uses of XML Schema
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
  • Re: incompatible uses of XML Schema
    • From: Gregor <iamgregor@g...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XSD spec question
• Next by Date: Re: XSD spec question
• Previous by thread: Re: incompatible uses of XML Schema
• Next by thread: Re: incompatible uses of XML Schema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread