• To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@i...>,"Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Subject: RE: incompatible uses of XML Schema
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 08:50:27 -0700
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Thread-index: AcVGY/8bOty/wGDBTq2kN0BrsICG2AAJbbiQ
• Thread-topic: incompatible uses of XML Schema

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henry S. Thompson [mailto:ht@i...] 
> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 4:16 AM
> To: Rick Jelliffe
> Cc: xml-dev@l...
> Subject: Re:  incompatible uses of XML Schema
> 
> Please also come to the W3C Workshop on XML Schema 1.0 User 
> Experiences [1], one of whose goals is to compare notes on 
> interoperability problems and, we hope, increase pressure on 
> vendors to fix the big ones.
> 
> I have to say I'm amazed that their are commercial products 
> out there which claim to support W3C XML Schema but not 
> wildcards -- that's not one that has ever surfaced before in 
> messages to this list or xmlschema-dev.

We shouldn't confuse schema validation issues with XML<->object mapping
issues. From the sounds of things the problem is the latter not the
former. 


--
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
Two wrongs are only the beginning.   

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.  

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: incompatible uses of XML Schema
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
  • Re: incompatible uses of XML Schema
    • From: ht@i... (Henry S. Thompson)

• Prev by Date: RE: incompatible uses of XML Schema
• Next by Date: Re: incompatible uses of XML Schema
• Previous by thread: Re: incompatible uses of XML Schema
• Next by thread: Re: incompatible uses of XML Schema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread