- To: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@y...>, xml-dev@l...
- Subject: Re: Re: Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits"myth come from?
- From: Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@g...>
- Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 01:45:46 -0800
- In-reply-to: <20050207094343.76111.qmail@w...>
- References: <20050207094343.76111.qmail@w...>
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913)
Dimitre,
I'm still trying to get the hang of this new-fangled e-mail thang.
-- Kurt
Dimitre Novatchev wrote:
Hi Kurt,
It seems that you send the reply only to me, while, obviously, you ment to
send it to everyone. Or am I wrong?
Cheers,
Dimitre
--- Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@g...> wrote:
One of the things I'm unsure about in this thread is the degree to which
a toolkit and an IDE mesh. I, like Dmitre, work heavily with several
IDEs, including Stylus, Oxygen and XSelerator, and I too would be remiss
in saying that I have trouble when I'm forced back into routine text
mode because those tools aren't handy. Having said that, are these IDEs
toolkits? To me, a toolkit is a generator that completely abstracts out
the generation of the code from the presentation of that code - for
instance, by using diagrams to represent specific elements and their
connection points, then letting those diagrams act as proxies in
generating the code. A web services toolkit would let you create a UML
instance as listbox entries and text fields, generate the corresponding
WSDL and SOAP proxies, and provide the appropriate code-gen wrappers.
While I would be perfectly comfortable doing that for web services, I
would be MUCH more skittish about giving the system that level of
control for the generation of XSLT, as I think a lot of the power of
that language comes in the ability to recognize pattern abstractions
that lie outside of the scope of what an IDE can promise.
-- Kurt
Dimitre Novatchev wrote"
"Rich Salz" <rsalz@d...> wrote in message
Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0502061301180.5062-100000@s...">news:Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0502061301180.5062-100000@s......
The point that hand-authored XML may be a small percentage of the
volume but it is more important as assets in the typical system is a
very interesting one that I'll have to think about.
Don't forget to include other XML "languages" such as XSLT.
For the last three years I have been using a nice XSLT IDE to write
XSLT
code. Without the XSelerator I wouldn't have written probably half of
this
code.
As the technology matures we're having a growing number of other very
good
XSLT IDEs around -- the one in Visual Studio 2005, Stylus Studio,
Oxygen,
..., etc.
With this tendency in mind I predict that in the nearest future
any serious XSLT development that is not based on the use of an XSLT
IDE
will be close to zero.
Dimitre Novatchev.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org http://www.xml.org, an
initiative of OASIS http://www.oasis-open.org
The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php
=====
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev.
http://fxsl.sourceforge.net/ -- the home of FXSL
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
|
|