• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from?
• From: "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@y...>
• Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 19:32:14 +1100
• References: <e3a5cb2c05020609516779e7d6@m...> <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0502061301180.5062-100000@s...>
• Sender: news <news@s...>

"Rich Salz" <rsalz@d...> wrote in message
Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0502061301180.5062-100000@s...">news:Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0502061301180.5062-100000@s......
>> The point that hand-authored XML may be a small percentage of the
>> volume but it is more important as assets in the typical system is a
>> very interesting one that I'll have to think about.
>
> Don't forget to include other XML "languages" such as XSLT.

For the last three years I have been using a nice XSLT IDE to write XSLT
code. Without the XSelerator I wouldn't have written probably half of this
code.

As the technology matures we're having a growing number of other very good
XSLT IDEs around -- the one in Visual Studio 2005, Stylus Studio, Oxygen,
..., etc.

With this tendency in mind I predict that in the nearest future
any serious XSLT development that is not based on the use of an XSLT IDE
will be close to zero.

Dimitre Novatchev.

• References:
  • Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from?
    • From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>
  • Re: Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from?
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits"myth come from?
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from?
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" myth come from?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread