• To: "'Alan Gutierrez'" <alan-xml-dev@e...>,"'Karl Waclawek'" <karl@w...>
• Subject: RE: XPath Binding API (Was: XPattern Specification)
• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 16:27:41 -0000
• Cc: "'xml-dev'" <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <20050117153547.GA17990@m...>
• Thread-index: AcT8qs3DTmLZ80rhSyCi5dcVNrRVqwABmqtw

 
>     I'm looking at Saxon, Jaxon, and Xalan, and they all have a
>     different Java language binding for XPath, which is annoying for
>     me as an application developer.

JAXP 1.3 and DOM Level 3 have both tried to solve this problem. Over on the
XOM list, Elliotte Rusty Harold is trying to solve it again for the XOM
model. Please don't invent another XPath API!

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XPath Binding API (Was: XPattern Specification)
    • From: 'Alan Gutierrez' <alan-xml-dev@e...>

• References:
  • XPath Binding API (Was: XPattern Specification)
    • From: Alan Gutierrez <alan-xml-dev@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XPattern Specification
• Next by Date: RE: XPath Binding API (Was: XPattern Specification)
• Previous by thread: Re: XPath Binding API (Was: XPattern Specification)
• Next by thread: Re: XPath Binding API (Was: XPattern Specification)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread