• To: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
• Subject: Re: XPath Binding API (Was: XPattern Specification)
• From: 'Alan Gutierrez' <alan-xml-dev@e...>
• Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:46:49 -0500
• Cc: 'Karl Waclawek' <karl@w...>, 'xml-dev' <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <E1CqZjF-0006Jx-00@u...>
• Mail-followup-to: Michael Kay <mike@s...>,'Karl Waclawek' <karl@w...>,'xml-dev' <xml-dev@l...>
• References: <20050117153547.GA17990@m...> <E1CqZjF-0006Jx-00@u...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

* Michael Kay <mike@s...> [2005-01-17 11:27]:
>  
> >     I'm looking at Saxon, Jaxon, and Xalan, and they all have a
> >     different Java language binding for XPath, which is annoying for
> >     me as an application developer.
> 
> JAXP 1.3 and DOM Level 3 have both tried to solve this problem. Over on the
> XOM list, Elliotte Rusty Harold is trying to solve it again for the XOM
> model. Please don't invent another XPath API!

    Okay. If you insist. But, function binding, where?

--
Alan Gutierrez - alan@e...

• References:
  • XPath Binding API (Was: XPattern Specification)
    • From: Alan Gutierrez <alan-xml-dev@e...>
  • RE: XPath Binding API (Was: XPattern Specification)
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XPattern Specification
• Next by Date: Re: XPath Binding API (Was: XPattern Specification)
• Previous by thread: RE: XPath Binding API (Was: XPattern Specification)
• Next by thread: Re: XPattern Specification
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread