• To: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>
• Subject: Re: A bunch of components, but no mandated organization - reasonable?
• From: david.lyon@c...
• Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 13:30:17 +1100
• Cc: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <41E5CDA8.6070005@z...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE07206ACD@h...> <41E59140.9070009@z...> <cc159a4a05011213543aa733f5@m...> <41E59ECC.60306@z...> <cc159a4a05011214196599744d@m...> <41E5CDA8.6070005@z...>
• User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.6

Quoting Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>:

> decomposition fascinates me because we have 3000 years (at least) of
> experience with it (back to the ancient greeks) and it pervades our
> thinking.

When you say you are an older timer... you're really weren't kidding
were you?

:-)



----------------------------------------------------------------

• References:
  • RE: A bunch of components, but no mandated organization - reasonable?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
  • Re: A bunch of components, but no mandated organization - reasonable?
    • From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>
  • Re: A bunch of components, but no mandated organization - reasonable?
    • From: Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@g...>
  • Re: A bunch of components, but no mandated organization- reasonable?
    • From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>
  • Re: A bunch of components, but no mandated organization - reasonable?
    • From: Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@g...>
  • Re: A bunch of components, but no mandated organization- reasonable?
    • From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>

• Prev by Date: Re: A bunch of components, but no mandated organization- reasonable?
• Next by Date: Re: Sarissa issues
• Previous by thread: Re: A bunch of components, but no mandated organization- reasonable?
• Next by thread: Re: A bunch of components, but no mandated organization - reasonable?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread