Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
And the fact of trading (that these components are created and shared by some network of traders "dynamically assembled by one system and shipped to another where the assembly is dynamically understood") infers that some common maps already exist, aka, the upper level enterprise/market ontology. Intentionality is the impetus of ontology. No matter how simple the intent is, it will shape the understanding. It is a centrality and may be a transient or permanent attractor that creates meaning. len From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) From: Roger L. Costello [mailto:costello@m...] >I assume that this question has as its impetus ... Here's my motivation for the question: in a large, complex Enterprise you may know the kinds of "things" that need to be moved around (e.g., Book, BookCover, etc) but you don't have a-priori knowledge of the specific transactions that will be needed. So, is it feasible to simply declare a bunch of components (that everyone understands), which may be dynamically assembled by one system and shipped to another system where the assembly is dynamically understood.
|
