• To: Chiusano Joseph <chiusano_joseph@b...>
• Subject: RE: A bunch of components, but no mandated organization - reasonable?
• From: david.lyon@c...
• Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 08:54:11 +1100
• Cc: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <74B14CBC0FEB9D4EB16969F09FA51F451767D6@M...>
• References: <74B14CBC0FEB9D4EB16969F09FA51F451767D6@M...>
• User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.6

Jo

> One does not "buy" this kind of SOAP - it's an open standard that is
> implemented in various products.

but the customer would be "buying" a solution after having been
"sold" it. They would be paying in real rupees or whatever for
it.

Anyway... why put so much effort into arguing with a dumb australian
trying to get him to use soap...

that's an effort that seems just doomed to fail.....

next there'll be a protocol call "beerless" and we'll
be expected to use that also....



----------------------------------------------------------------

• References:
  • RE: A bunch of components, but no mandated organization - reasonable?
    • From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XPattern Redux
• Next by Date: XPattern Specification
• Previous by thread: RE: A bunch of components, but no mandated organization - reasonable?
• Next by thread: RE: A bunch of components, but no mandated organization - reasonable?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread