[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 22:26:34 +0200, Oleg Tkachenko <oleg@t...> wrote: > It would be really nice to have such streamable XPath subset strictly > defined (and probably with different name). Many attempts to implement > XPath in a streaming way, such as Microsoft's XPathReader [1] (which is > actually used in Biztalk internally) are hardly widely usable primarily > because of proprietary XPath subsetting. This doesn't sound like too bad a job, but it's not worth it unless people are willing to use and support it in their code. Obviously, a streaming XPath subset is appropriate for use with streaming parser APIs like SAX and STAX -- where else would it be useful? XML networking? Search and indexing? There's also the question of context -- would the only context be the stack, or do people hope to have access to left siblings as well? All the best, David -- http://www.megginson.com/
|

Cart



