• To: "'David Megginson'" <david.megginson@g...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: XPath and XPattern (was Re: More on taming SAX)
• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 18:34:50 -0000
• In-reply-to: <75cb920c041223101158b9a01e@m...>
• Thread-index: AcTpGvyg5c47BlXuSVGjs4G//zNRtgAAn8og

> Thanks again to Uche for the clarification (I already thanked him
> privately) -- I either never knew or have completely forgotten the
> term "XPattern" for an XSLT pattern, but I wasn't much involved with
> the XSL people in the late 1990s.
> 
> Perhaps the term 'XPattern' would be safe to reuse for a
> SAX/STAX-friendly XPath subset, then?  That's what I had originally
> (and mistakenly) thought Uche was writing about.

Uche: are your XPatterns full XSLT patterns? That is, can they include any
XPath expression within a predicate? Or are they more like the subset of
XPath used in XML Schema uniqueness constraints, which is designed for
serial on-the-fly evaluation and doesn't allow predicates at all?

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: XPath and XPattern (was Re: More on tamingSAX)
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <Uche.Ogbuji@f...>
  • Re: XPath and XPattern (was Re: More on tamingSAX)
    • From: Oleg Tkachenko <oleg@t...>

• References:
  • XPath and XPattern (was Re: More on taming SAX)
    • From: David Megginson <david.megginson@g...>

• Prev by Date: XPath and XPattern (was Re: More on taming SAX)
• Next by Date: Re: More on taming SAX (was Re: ANN: Amara XMLToolkit 0.9.0)
• Previous by thread: XPath and XPattern (was Re: More on taming SAX)
• Next by thread: Re: XPath and XPattern (was Re: More on tamingSAX)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread