• To: "'Liam Quin'" <liam@w...>,"'xml-dev'" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Number of active public XML schemas
• From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
• Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 20:26:44 -0000
• In-reply-to: <20041101194609.GD24287@w...>
• Thread-index: AcTAS1S9N8LRH7kJQ4i+MmViR0kgJAABWHRQ

> 
> Or because they [DTDs] are easier to understand, 

I have yet to see a DTD of more than trivial size that is not totally
impenetrable. And fragile too, if you are rash enough to make a one line
change that breaks an entire edifice of parameter entities and conditional
sections.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Number of active public XML schemas
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
  • Re: Number of active public XML schemas
    • From: 'Liam Quin' <liam@w...>

• References:
  • Re: Number of active public XML schemas
    • From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Creating flexible & extensible schemas (for a university Event)
• Next by Date: Re: Number of active public XML schemas
• Previous by thread: Re: Imprimaturs - W3C and ISO
• Next by thread: Re: Number of active public XML schemas
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread