• To: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>
• Subject: Re: Imprimaturs - W3C and ISO
• From: Jeff Rafter <lists@j...>
• Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 18:37:35 -0800
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <e3a5cb2c0411011704137b0dba@m...>
• References: <5.2.0.9.0.20041101153522.018fcc10@p...> <20041101221252.OAVG24841.mta02-svc.ntlworld.com@Turtle> <e3a5cb2c0411011704137b0dba@m...>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913)

> I dunno .. look at the reports from the Microsoft-centric XML
> Developers Conference I linked to in the Partyin' thread.  There seems
> to be a lot of disaffection with XSD, at least in its current form.

I wasn't at the conference, but read most of the blogging that I could 
find coming out of it-- I distinctly remember reading an opposing 
viewpoint... I will have to hunt it out-- IIRC the comments about Scott 
and Patrick's use of XML Schema were, in general, extremely positive 
(except from Don). Having missed it I wonder if it was as anti-schema as 
you describe..

Thanks,
Jeff Rafter

• References:
  • Imprimaturs - W3C and ISO
    • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>
  • RE: Imprimaturs - W3C and ISO
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
  • Re: Imprimaturs - W3C and ISO
    • From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Imprimaturs - W3C and ISO
• Next by Date: RE: Imprimaturs - W3C and ISO
• Previous by thread: Re: Imprimaturs - W3C and ISO
• Next by thread: RE: Number of active public XML schemas
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread