• To: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Subject: Re: Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
• From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>
• Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 17:55:11 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <41914639.2010808@d...>
• References: <200411081326.iA8DQXR27673@s...> <e3a5cb2c041108065521cfce84@m...> <4190028D.6080409@z...> <419129DC.7020508@d...> <41912D6E.6080700@z...> <41914255.30300@d...> <20041109223221.GG18528@w...> <41914639.2010808@d...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i

On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 05:35:37PM -0500, Jonathan Robie wrote:
> >But in the comparison between XQuery and XSLT people are comparing the
> >non-XML textual representation of XQuery with XSLT.
> 
> I actually think a keyword syntax for XSLT might be more accessible for 
> many programmers.

It might.  I'd like to see a human-readable XML syntax for XML Query,
too (like XSLTs).  But let's finish the curent spec first! :-)

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/

• References:
  • Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
    • From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>
  • Re: Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
    • From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>
  • Re: Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
    • From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>
  • Re: Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
  • Re: Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
    • From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>
  • Re: Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
  • Re: Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
    • From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>
  • Re: Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
• Next by Date: RE: Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
• Previous by thread: Re: Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
• Next by thread: Re: Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread