• To: Liam Quin <liam@w...>
• Subject: Re: Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
• From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 17:35:37 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <20041109223221.GG18528@w...>
• References: <200411081326.iA8DQXR27673@s...> <e3a5cb2c041108065521cfce84@m...> <4190028D.6080409@z...> <419129DC.7020508@d...> <41912D6E.6080700@z...> <41914255.30300@d...> <20041109223221.GG18528@w...>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913)

Liam Quin wrote:

> But in the comparison between XQuery and XSLT people are comparing the
> non-XML textual representation of XQuery with XSLT.

I actually think a keyword syntax for XSLT might be more accessible for 
many programmers.

Note that RELAX-NG has both an XML-based and keyword-based syntax.I 
think that's worked out well.

Jonathan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
    • From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>

• References:
  • Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
    • From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@m...>
  • Re: Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
    • From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>
  • Re: Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
    • From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>
  • Re: Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
  • Re: Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
    • From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>
  • Re: Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
  • Re: Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
    • From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
• Next by Date: Re: Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
• Previous by thread: Re: Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
• Next by thread: Re: Hello XQuery ... Goodbye XSLT?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread