[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Elliotte Harold wrote: > Maybe I'm weird, but I find RNG to be easier to read and follow than > RNC. It's certainly easier to write. Notwithstanding how weird you may be, some people prefer a highly regular verbose syntax over a symbol-laden compact syntax and others are too orthodox to use any non-XML syntax. The former seems reasonable and, as it is highly subjective, inarguable. If you took a poll, though, I believe that you would find that more people prefer the compact RNG syntax. There seem to be, for example, more published schemas in RNC syntax than RNG. Bob Foster http://xmlbuddy.com/
|

Cart



