• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Partyin' like it's 1999
• From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 18:26:31 +0100
• In-reply-to: <417F8DEB.3090902@m...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE07206889@h...> <417EEF54.6040004@p...> <e3a5cb2c0410261854749cbffd@m...> <417F8DEB.3090902@m...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8a1) Gecko/20040520

Elliotte Harold wrote:

> Michael Champion wrote:
> 
> uch like YAML or RNC is likely to be the ordinary-mortal
> 
>> readable/writable serialization.  
> 
> 
> Maybe I'm weird, but I find RNG to be easier to read and follow than 
> RNC. It's certainly easier to write.

I agree, but you're the only person I've heard of that that does. 
Most people I've seen that have the choice will use RNC.

cheers
Bill

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Partyin' like it's 1999
    • From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>

• References:
  • RE: Partyin' like it's 1999
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
  • Re: Partyin' like it's 1999
    • From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
  • Re: Partyin' like it's 1999
    • From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>
  • Re: Partyin' like it's 1999
    • From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Partyin' like it's 1999
• Next by Date: RE: Partyin' like it's 1999
• Previous by thread: Re: Partyin' like it's 1999
• Next by thread: Re: Partyin' like it's 1999
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread