• To: "'Eric van der Vlist'" <vdv@d...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: W3C XML Schema design tools
• From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
• Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 16:30:22 +0100
• In-reply-to: <1098396881.13096.81.camel@delleric>
• Thread-index: AcS3u9tYiMfUSUe9S66i0YLyjuZjqwAj5WwA

> 
> Other editors such as <oxygen/> and stylus seem promising (at 
> least from
> their documentations)... 
> 
> What are you using (or advising) to edit your schemas?

I'm using Stylus Studio, and one of the things I like about it is that I can
validate easily using any schema processor (including my own), which is
rather necessary given the variations between products. Certainly publishing
a schema that you've only checked with one tool is pretty irresponsible.

I agree that it would be great to have access to some of the refactorings
that I'm used to in my Java IDE. I'm not a great fan of graphical
representations (it's hard enough to learn one representation without having
to learn several), but easy navigation of schemas is definitely needed.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

• References:
  • W3C XML Schema design tools
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: After XQuery, are we done?
• Next by Date: RE: Why *is* XQuery taking so long?
• Previous by thread: RE: W3C XML Schema design tools
• Next by thread: RE: W3C XML Schema design tools
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread