Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
How do those browsers declare support for the namespaces? I like the IE means. It is easy to build and share stylesheets that indicate precisely what is needed to support the author's intentions. I've not used the moz or ffox so I've not compared the means. With new modalities coming online (eg, see the new xml.com article for voice markup), it becomes more pressing to converge on the means, at least for the sake of authors. len From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@n...] It's also how mozilla (and netscape and firefox etc) work, in that case without needing any proprietary declarations (and having native xhtml rendering) MathML works out of the box and svg enabled builds of mozilla are available. > Yet I don't find schemas > for these perhaps because the schema would document > the object framework. > there's a dtd for xhtml+svg+mathml here: http://www.w3.org/TR/XHTMLplusMathMLplusSVG/ that currently doesnt have an xsd but says The possibility of combining those modules written in XML Schema [XMLSchema] might be explored when XML Schemas for XHTML [XHTMLMODSchema] and others become available and mature in the mean time if you need a schema there's always trang...
|
