• To: "'bry@i...'" <bry@i...>, "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@U...>
• Subject: RE: Are people really using Identity constraints specif ied in XML schema?
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
• Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 09:31:34 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...

Would it be fair to say CAM is a dynamic document generator 
using boilerplate libraries?

That's not perjorative.  We've been building these since 
the CALS days and before.  The difference is we didn't use 
markup as the syntax for functions. (Thou Shalt Not 
Program in Markup: the early ISO dictum that held SGML's 
head under water while other declarative systems with 
better political positions pushed hypermedia to the 
side in favor of more complex solutions and vendors).

So why would I want to use CAM templates over SQL 
stored queries and merge-laden scripted functions? 
I'm reading the document cited in the last email, 
not all of them, so I may miss something important.

len

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Are people really using Identity constraints specif ied in XML schema?
    • From: bry@i...
  • Re: Are people really using Identity constraints specified in XML schema?
    • From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Are people really using Identity constraints specified in XML schema?
• Next by Date: RE: Are people really using Identity constraints specified in XML schema?
• Previous by thread: RE: Quick question regarding XML Schema and PSVI
• Next by thread: Re: Are people really using Identity constraints specified in XML schema?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread