Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
bry@i... writes: > > Quoting "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@U...>: > > > I, for one, am very interested in discussing these issues further. > > Since XML Schema data typing cannot express all the business rules > > that constrain, for example, patent document numbers (from > about 100 > > issuing offices), what other technologies can be invoked > that would? > > What combination of technologies should be used, and in > what order, to > > accomplish the goal? I'm interested in standards-based > technologies, > > such as XML Schema, to express such rules in a fashion that > removes as > > much variation as possible among systems that implement them around > > the world. Should we use a repository for the rules and their > > implementations? > > > > Is anyone else interested? > wow, this sounds like CAM > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=cam Many thanks for the link, when I first head of CAM the description didn't make it sound at all useful (seems to me the name only partially reflects the intended capabilities). This might be a standard that we may eventually want to support. Questions: 1) Just glancing at the spec it appears to have at least some overlap with Schematron for parts of it. Anyone looked at a Schematron to CAM(/subcomponent?) conversion or the converse? 2) Any one using this for anything production like? 3) Any recommended software?
|
