• To: bry@i...
• Subject: Re: governmental recommendation(non-US) that rpc(RFC1831) should be abandoned
• From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>
• Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 06:59:39 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• Organization: Booz Allen Hamilton
• References: <1088067645.40da983d49ba7@h...>

bry@i... wrote:
> 
> Hi, quick survey of responses here, does it seem reasonable that in a government
> publication(not U.S government) describing various standards as either ones that
> should be abandoned, that are recommended, and that are accepted, that RPC
> should be abandoned 

Could you please elaborate on your specific usage of "RPC" here? Do you
mean SOAP-based RPC mechanisms, distributed object computing
(CORBA/DCOM/RMI), etc.

and that SOAP-based Webservices are accepted - using SOAP
> 1.1, and WSDL 1.1?
> 
> Note that HTTP 1.1 is also accepted, 

Do you mean SOAP over HTTP? HTML and HTTP? etc.

and data integration with xml is
> recomended, so I suppose REST is slightly higher than SOAP. 

What would "higher" mean here? You are referring to a stack?

Kind Regards,
Joe Chiusano
Booz | Allen | Hamilton

> Although not if I
> ask anyone around here.
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> 
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>

begin:vcard 
n:Chiusano;Joseph
tel;work:(703) 902-6923
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:www.bah.com
org:Booz | Allen | Hamilton;IT Digital Strategies Team
adr:;;8283 Greensboro Drive;McLean;VA;22012;
version:2.1
email;internet:chiusano_joseph@b...
title:Senior Consultant
fn:Joseph M. Chiusano
end:vcard

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: governmental recommendation(non-US) that rpc(RFC1831) should be abandoned
    • From: bry@i...

• References:
  • governmental recommendation(non-US) that rpc(RFC1831) should be abandoned
    • From: bry@i...

• Prev by Date: governmental recommendation(non-US) that rpc(RFC1831) should be abandoned
• Next by Date: Re: governmental recommendation(non-US) thatrpc(RFC1831) should be abandoned
• Previous by thread: governmental recommendation(non-US) that rpc(RFC1831) should be abandoned
• Next by thread: Re: governmental recommendation(non-US) that rpc(RFC1831) should be abandoned
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread