• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: governmental recommendation(non-US) that rpc(RFC1831) should be abandoned
• From: bry@i...
• Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:00:45 +0200
• User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2

Hi, quick survey of responses here, does it seem reasonable that in a government
publication(not U.S government) describing various standards as either ones that
should be abandoned, that are recommended, and that are accepted, that RPC
should be abandoned and that SOAP-based Webservices are accepted - using SOAP
1.1, and WSDL 1.1? 

Note that HTTP 1.1 is also accepted, and data integration with xml is
recomended, so I suppose REST is slightly higher than SOAP. Although not if I
ask anyone around here. 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: governmental recommendation(non-US) thatrpc(RFC1831) should be abandoned
    • From: Rex Brooks <rexb@s...>
  • Re: governmental recommendation(non-US) that rpc(RFC1831) should be abandoned
    • From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>

• Prev by Date: Re: How It All Goes Wrong (WAS RE: Triplets on the Internet)
• Next by Date: Re: governmental recommendation(non-US) that rpc(RFC1831) should be abandoned
• Previous by thread: What is the difference between the XMLinfoset and Canonical xml?
• Next by thread: Re: governmental recommendation(non-US) that rpc(RFC1831) should be abandoned
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread