• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
• From: =?UTF-8?B?QmlsbCBkZSBow5NyYQ==?= <bill.dehora@p...>
• Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 22:39:37 +0100
• In-reply-to: <86n03dhhru.fsf@f...>
• References: <0E36FD96D96FCA4AA8E8F2D199320E52020A3BCC@R...> <40C58574.2020908@p...> <86n03dhhru.fsf@f...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8a1) Gecko/20040520

K. Ari Krupnikov wrote:

> Bill de hÃ?ra <bill.dehora@p...> writes:
>
>>There's nothing notable about Google in this respect, other than it
>>being popular.
> 
> It works, unlike the SW Xanadu? That, and is not to my knowledge under
> the control of any large corporate or government entity.

I didn't understand this bit.


>>I'm surprised no-one's mentioned DMOZ yet.
> 
> Does it index the tags Joshua wants? Without human intervention? Can
> you pay them to have your format indexed?

Draw your own conclusions: http://www.dmoz.org/

cheers
Bill

• References:
  • RE: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
    • From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@m...>
  • Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
    • From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
  • Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
    • From: ari@c... (K. Ari Krupnikov)

• Prev by Date: RE: Bruce Perens and yet more patents
• Next by Date: RE: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
• Previous by thread: Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
• Next by thread: RE: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread