• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
• From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 10:23:00 +0100
• In-reply-to: <0E36FD96D96FCA4AA8E8F2D199320E52020A3BCC@R...>
• References: <0E36FD96D96FCA4AA8E8F2D199320E52020A3BCC@R...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624

Joshua Allen wrote:


> You're missing the point.  With Google, you only get indexed the
> metadata that they permit you to index.  Period.  It's the opposite of
> open.  

There's nothing notable about Google in this respect, other than it 
being popular.

I'm surprised no-one's mentioned DMOZ yet.

cheers
Bill
-- 
Propylon
http://www.propylon.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
    • From: ari@c... (K. Ari Krupnikov)

• References:
  • RE: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
    • From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: The triples datamodel -- was Re: SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
• Next by Date: RE: Difference between RPC and Doc. type in WSDL(need help)
• Previous by thread: RE: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
• Next by thread: Re: Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread