Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Ken North wrote, > > > XQJ is an API for Java programs, but that doesn't mean the format > > > of the data going across the wire has to be Java-centric. > > Miles Sabin wrote: > > Did anyone say it did? > > There's been discussion here about techniques for passing queries to > an XQuery processor. There was a suggestion Java programs should > parse them and pass them as serialized abstract syntax trees (one > benefit being compile-time type checking). That seems a reasonable > alternative as an option, but not as a replacement, for sending > XQuery strings down the wire. <sigh/> There was no such suggestion. You should go back and reread Burak Emir's posts a little more carefully: he proposed that the _API_ should have been designed around an abstract model of queries. This has no implications whatsoever for what gets sent over the wire. Cheers, Miles
|
