[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Ken North wrote, > Miles Sabin wrote: > > Your general point here is well taken ... however, in this case > > we're discussing a deliberately Java-specific API. > > XQJ is an API for Java programs, but that doesn't mean the format of > the data going across the wire has to be Java-centric. Did anyone say it did? Cheers, Miles
|

Cart



