• To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Subject: Re: xml prolog - what am I missing?
• From: Chris Bentley <chris@w...>
• Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 03:37:48 +1000
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <7A00DB79-A9B4-11D8-BEB2-000A95A51C9E@t...>
• References: <7A4A7BE9-A9AD-11D8-AE89-00039312A3C2@w...> <7A00DB79-A9B4-11D8-BEB2-000A95A51C9E@t...>

> I don't think Tantek would say that since it's clearly not correct and 
> Tantek is usually correct. -Tim

How else should I interpret these examples?
http://tantek.com/XHTML/Test/minimal.html#combos

in any case thanks to you both for the clarification.

chris,

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: xml prolog - what am I missing?
    • From: Mike Fitzgerald <mikefz@w...>

• References:
  • xml prolog - what am I missing?
    • From: Chris Bentley <chris@w...>
  • Re: xml prolog - what am I missing?
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Universal Schema to Validate an Arbitrary Well-Formed Document
• Next by Date: RE: xml prolog - what am I missing?
• Previous by thread: Re: xml prolog - what am I missing?
• Next by thread: Re: xml prolog - what am I missing?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread