• To: Chris Bentley <chris@w...>
• Subject: Re: xml prolog - what am I missing?
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 09:49:21 -0700
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <7A4A7BE9-A9AD-11D8-AE89-00039312A3C2@w...>
• References: <7A4A7BE9-A9AD-11D8-AE89-00039312A3C2@w...>

On May 19, 2004, at 8:59 AM, Chris Bentley wrote:

> Hi, I'm  confused can some put me right;
>
> I keep seeing references alluding to the fact that a document type 
> declaration IS NOT part of an XML prolog.
> e.g., http://tantek.com/XHTML/Test/minimal.html amongst others.

Uh, it clearly is.  On the other hand, the Document Type *Definition* 
(AKA DTD) can have an internal part and an external part.  I don't 
think Tantek would say that since it's clearly not correct and Tantek 
is usually correct. -Tim

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: xml prolog - what am I missing?
    • From: Chris Bentley <chris@w...>

• References:
  • xml prolog - what am I missing?
    • From: Chris Bentley <chris@w...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Universal Schema to Validate an Arbitrary Well-Form ed Document
• Next by Date: Re: xml prolog - what am I missing?
• Previous by thread: xml prolog - what am I missing?
• Next by thread: Re: xml prolog - what am I missing?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread