• To: <martind@n...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Elliote Rusty Harold: W3C XForms The Next Big Thing?
• From: "Micah Dubinko" <MDubinko@v...>
• Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 18:22:44 -0700
• Thread-index: AcRDLyw32Y8zptXkTIeqgPvUKINEagBIsc+A
• Thread-topic: Elliote Rusty Harold: W3C XForms The Next Big Thing?

I've often thought about just such a thing:

>Maybe the solution is to create a set of specification for abstract pattern
>of interactions, for example:

>Select one element from a list,
>Select several elements form a list,
>Browse and edit a tree representation,
>Browse and edit a table representation,
>Enter text,
>Enter rich format text,
>Etc...

For it to be useful, it would have to have widespread acceptance, a la exslt.org. In fact, I've talked to the EXSLT folks before, and they weren't openly hostile to the idea.

.micah

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Elliote Rusty Harold: W3C XForms The Next Big Thing?
    • From: Didier PH Martin <martind@n...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225)
• Next by Date: RE: Elliote Rusty Harold: W3C XForms The Next Big Thing?
• Previous by thread: Problem with entity expansion and SAX parser
• Next by thread: RE: Elliote Rusty Harold: W3C XForms The Next Big Thing?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread