• To: 'Tim Bray' <tbray@t...>, "xml-dev@l... DEV" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Costs, benefits, and emperors with wardrobe malfunctions - was Re: WS-Emperor naked?
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 16:23:10 -0500

I keep asking:  what happened to the WSIO?  They said they were 
going to work out incompatibility issues in the WS spec domain. 

Did they?

len


From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@t...]

Oh good, I assumed there had to be one.  Is there a pointer to 
somewhere that I can read about the basic architecture underlying all 
the WS-* stuff? -Tim

  - Tim Bray
     AccessLine: +1-877-305-0889
     AIM: MarkupPedant
  - Tim Bray
     AccessLine: +1-877-305-0889
     AIM: MarkupPedant
  - Tim Bray
     AccessLine: +1-877-305-0889
     AIM: MarkupPedant

• Follow-Ups:
  • Converting xml to csv with xslt
    • From: "Jerry Lake" <jerry@b...>
  • RE: Costs, benefits, and emperors with wardrobe malfunctions - was Re: WS-Emperor naked?
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Costs, benefits, and emperors with wardrobe malfunctions - was Re: WS-Emperor naked?
• Next by Date: RE: Costs, benefits, and emperors with wardrobe malfunctions - was Re: WS-Emperor naked?
• Previous by thread: RE: Will Father Moore save us from our sins? - was Re: Eclipse: the new Emacs? (and the XML story)
• Next by thread: RE: Costs, benefits, and emperors with wardrobe malfunctions - was Re: WS-Emperor naked?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread