• To: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <clbullar@i...>
• Subject: RE: Costs, benefits, and emperors with wardrobe malfunctions - was Re: WS-Emperor naked?
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 18:48:33 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: "xml-dev@l... DEV" <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9F59F@h...>

> I keep asking:  what happened to the WSIO?  They said they were
> going to work out incompatibility issues in the WS spec domain.
>
> Did they?

In progress.  The WS-I profiles other standards, trying to pick the 80/20
rule for interoperability in Web Services.  They did a basic profile,
we're planning on releasing a draft of the security profile in June,
and the second edition of BP (including with and without attachments)
is also fairly far along.


Here's an old column about it that's still accurate:
   http://webservices.xml.com/pub/a/ws/2003/03/04/endpoints.html

Disclaimer:  I'm on the security WG.
        /r$

--
Rich Salz                  Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology       http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway  http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview      http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html

• References:
  • RE: Costs, benefits, and emperors with wardrobe malfunctions - was Re: WS-Emperor naked?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Competing Specifications - A Good or Bad Thing?
• Next by Date: Re: Competing Specifications - A Good or Bad Thing?
• Previous by thread: RE: Costs, benefits, and emperors with wardrobe malfunctions - was Re: WS-Emperor naked?
• Next by thread: Converting xml to csv with xslt
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread