• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Subject: Re: RE: Schema vs Schema-free
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 15:01:25 -0400
• Cc: 'xml-dev' <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9F62D@h...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9F62D@h...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030507

> But there is one schema per payload, yes?

per message hop.  I might know the details of some elements that you 
only know as xsd:any, for example.

	/r$

-- 
Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology                           http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway   http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview  http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html

• References:
  • RE: RE: Schema vs Schema-free
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Why a "general" solution? (was: RE: XML Binary Characterization WG public list available e)
• Next by Date: RE: Why a "general" solution? (was: RE: XML Binary Characterization WG public list available e)
• Previous by thread: RE: RE: Schema vs Schema-free
• Next by thread: RE: RE: Schema vs Schema-free
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread