• To: 'Rich Salz' <rsalz@d...>
• Subject: RE: RE: Schema vs Schema-free
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 13:58:13 -0500
• Cc: 'xml-dev' <xml-dev@l...>

But there is one schema per payload, yes?

len


From: Rich Salz [mailto:rsalz@d...]

> But, if you're writing data that others will read, then if you
> wish to be understood, you must follow the rules of the schema
> language you're using.

Sure.  But only if you buy into the "one schema per document" thesis, 
which we discussed earlier in this thread.  I don't buy it, Rusty 
doesn't, and neither does Noah (one of the XSD authors, surprise!).

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RE: Schema vs Schema-free
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RE: Schema vs Schema-free
• Next by Date: Why a "general" solution? (was: RE: XML Binary Characterization WG public list available e)
• Previous by thread: RE: RE: Schema vs Schema-free
• Next by thread: Re: RE: Schema vs Schema-free
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread