• To: rjm@z...
• Subject: Re: xml editors
• From: Sjoerd Visscher <sjoerd@w...>
• Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 11:57:07 +0200
• Cc: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <1082152184.2462.1.camel@z...>
• References: <1081934257.5334.12.camel@z...> <407D97D1.2040301@w...> <20040415000111.GE7829@w...> <407ED499.1050301@w...> <1082078970.2460.706.camel@z...> <407F5E64.2050102@w...> <1082152184.2462.1.camel@z...>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207)

Rick Marshall wrote:
> too bad. any plans for other browsers?
> 
> On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 14:17, Mike Fitzgerald wrote:
> 
>>ie 5.5+ only -Mike

We need XSL, XPath and some form of contentEditable, so that leaves out 
a lot of browsers.

Xopus could be made to work on Mozilla, but that would probably take a 
few months. We'd love to do it, but when you do the financial math, it's 
not worth it. 2 years ago Xopus (sort of) worked in Mozilla, but our 
customers clearly preferred a richer feature set in IE over 
compatability with Mozilla.

-- 
Sjoerd Visscher
http://w3future.com/weblog/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: xml editors
    • From: "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw@l...>

• References:
  • xml editors
    • From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>
  • Re: xml editors
    • From: Sjoerd Visscher <sjoerd@w...>
  • Re: xml editors
    • From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>
  • Re: xml editors
    • From: Sjoerd Visscher <sjoerd@w...>
  • Re: xml editors
    • From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>
  • Re: xml editors
    • From: Mike Fitzgerald <mikefz@w...>
  • Re: xml editors
    • From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Fast text output from SAX?
• Next by Date: Re: RDDL and user interface
• Previous by thread: Re: xml editors
• Next by thread: Re: xml editors
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread